![]() |
||
Welcome to International Journal of Research in Social Sciences & HumanitiesE-ISSN : 2249 - 4642 | P-ISSN: 2454 - 4671 IMPACT FACTOR: 8.561 |
Abstract
HUMAN RIGHTS : EXERCISE OF JUDICIAL CONTROL OVER THE EXECUTION OF SENTENCE IN THE PRISONS
Dr. Seema Yadav
Volume: 5 Issue: 2 2015
Abstract:
There was no criminal law in uncivilized society. Every man was liable to be attacked on his person or property at any time by any one. The person attacked either succumbed or over-powered his opponent. “A tooth for a tooth, an eye for an eye, a life for a life” was the forerunner of criminal justice. As time advanced, the injured person agreed to accept compensation, instead of killing his adversary. Subsequently, a sliding scale of satisfying ordinary offences came into existence. Such a system gave birth to the archaic criminal law.
References
- Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab, (1980) 2 SCC 684: 1980 SCC (Cri) 580, 635: 1980 Cri. LJ636; see also Rajendra Prasad v. State of U.P., (1979) 3 SCC 646: 1979 SCC
- Allauddin Mian v. State of Bihar, (1989) 3 SCC 5:1989 SCC (Cri) 490: 1989 Cri LJ 1466
- Baburao Chandavar v. State, 1977 Cri. LJ 1980, 1982 (Del.)
- Mohammad Giasuddin v. State of A.P., (1977) 3 SCC 287:1977 SCC (Cri.) 496, 502: 1977 Cri.LI 1557; see also Santa Singh v. State of Punjab, (1976) 4 SCC 190: 1976 SCC (Cri) 546:1976Cri. LI 1875.
- Mohd. Hanif v. Emperor, AIR 1942 Bom. 215:43 Cri. LI 754
- Jamal Haq v. State of Tripura, (2006) 9 SCC 757
- B. Titus, Re, AIR 1941 Mad. 720, 723-724:43 Cri. LI 3; Ibrahim v. State, 1974 Cri. LI 993(All.)
- Praveen H. Parekh : Human Rights year book 2007
- M.P. Tondon, : Public International Law
- J.N. Pandey : Constitution of India
- Durga Das Basu : Introduction of the Constitution of India
- Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993

Refer & Earn |