![]() |
||
Welcome to International Journal of Research in Social Sciences & HumanitiesE-ISSN : 2249 - 4642 | P-ISSN: 2454 - 4671 IMPACT FACTOR: 8.561 |
Abstract
The Discourse Marker (Well) in Selected Talk Shows: A Discourse Analysis Study
Dr. Wafaa Mokhlos Faisal
Volume: 13 Issue: 1 2023
Abstract:
The study analyses the discourse marker (well) in talks shows and how this kind of discourse marker plays a key role in shaping the forms of interactions. The method of analysis is a qualitative one that interprets the meanings of (well) in media discourse. The model that the study adopts is Liddicoat (2007) and, the use of discourse marker (well) will be classified in accordance with Svartvik (1980 ) and Schiffrin (1987). The study attempts to answer the following questions: what are the functions of discourse marker "well" in media discourse? and where does it appear in the adjacency pairs? The study has reached at a number of results. One of these results is that the discourse marker "well" is used in media discourse to make or shift the topics of the conversation or to prepare for the second turn of the adjacency pairs.
References
- Crystal, D (1988). “Another look at, well, you know...” English Today, 13, 47–49.
- Erman, Britt (1987). Pragmatic Expressions in English. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell
- (1992). “Female and male usage of pragmatic expressions in same-sex and mixed sex interaction”. Language Variation and Change, 4, 217–234.
- Fraser, Bruce (1988). “Types of English discourse markers”. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 38, 19–33.
- Gregori-Signes, C. (2000). A Genre Based Approach to Daytime Talk on Television. Valencia : Lengua Inglesa University of Valencia
- Hilliard, Robert L. (2015). Writing for Television, Radio and News Media. Stambford: Cengage.
- Hutchby, I and Woofitt, R. (2008). Conversation Analysis. Polity: Cambridge.
- Jucker, Andreas H. and Smith, Sara W. (1998). “And people just you know like ‘wow’: Discourse markers as negotiating strategies”. In A. H. Jucker and Y. Ziv (Eds.), Discourse Markers: Description and Theory (pp. 171–202). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
- Lenk, Uta (1995). “Discourse markers and conversational coherence”. In B. Wårvik, S.-K. Tanskanen, and R. Hiltunen (Eds.), Organization in Discourse. Proceedings from the Turku Conference (pp. 341–352). Turku: University of Turku.
- Liddicoat, Anthony J. (2007). An Introduction to Conversation Analysis. London: Continuum.
- O'keef, A. (2006). Investigating Media Discourse. New York: Routledge
- Östman, Jan-Ola (1981). You know: A Discourse-Functional Approach [Vol. II: 7: Pragmatics & Beyond]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
- Schiffrin, Deborah (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Schourup, L (1985). Common Discourse Particles in English Conversation. New York: Garland.
- Schourup, L (1985). Common Discourse Particles in English Conversation. New York: Garland.
- Schourup, Lawrence (1999). “Tutorial overview: Discourse markers”. Lingua, 107, 227–265.
- Timberg, M. Bernard. (2002). Television Talk: A History of The TV Talk shows. Austin: University of Texas Press.
- STUBBS Michael, 1983. Discourse Analysis: The Sociolinguistic Analysis of Natural Language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell .
- Schiffrin, Deborah (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Svartvik, Jan (1980). Well in conversation. In S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, and J. Svartvik (Eds.), Studies in English Linguistics for Randolph Quirk (pp. 167–177). London: Longman.

Refer & Earn |