Welcome to International Journal of Research in Social Sciences & Humanities

E-ISSN : 2249 - 4642 | P-ISSN: 2454 - 4671

IMPACT FACTOR: 8.561

Abstract

A Pragmatic Study of Refusal Speech Act: A Gender Perspective

Dr Mushtaq Abdulrazzaq Abdulzahra

Volume: 11 Issue: 1 2021

Abstract:

In EFL context, there comes many situations in which we need to refuse an offer, suggestion, invitation or request. And because the choice of the refusal strategy may vary in terms of gender the current study, thus, aimed to reveal gender variations in the use of the speech act of refusal. The study sampled 86 EFL learners split equally into 43 males and females. Three quantitative research questions guided the study. The data were collected by means of DCT designed for this end. These data were input and analysed using SPSS and Excel sheets for descriptive and inferential statistics. The study revealed that there is a partial gender variation at these two refusal strategies which are: flat refusal and expressing regret. Both of which were used dominantly by the males. In in terms of directness, it is found that the males use more direct refusals than the females. It was also revealed that most frequent refusal strategy expressed by Iraqi EFL learners is expressing regret.

DOI: http://doi.org/10.37648/ijrssh.v11i01.029

Back Download

References

  • Abdul Sattar, H. Q. A., Lah, S. C., & Suleiman, R. R. R. (2011). Refusal Strategies In English By Malay University Students. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 11(3). 69-81.
  • Al-Eryani, A. A. (2007). Refusal strategies by Yemeni EFL learners. Asian EFL Journal, 9(2), 19- 34.
  • Allan, K. (2014). Linguistic Meaning (RLE Linguistics A: General Linguistics). Routledge.
  • Al-Mahrooqi, R., & Al-Aghbari, K. (2016). Refusal strategies among Omani EFL students. Sage Open, 6(4), 2158244016672907.
  • Al-Shboul, Y., Maros, M., & Yasin, M. S. M. (2012). An intercultural study of refusal strategies in English between Jordanian EFL and Malay ESL postgraduate students. 3L, Language, Linguistics, Literature, 18(3).
  • Austin, J. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: OUP.
  • Beebe, L. M., Takahashi, T., & Uliss-Weltz, R. (1990). Pragmatics transfer in ESL refusals. In R. Scarcella. E. Anderson and S. D. Krashen (Eds.), On the development of communicative competence in a second language (pp.55-73). New York: Newbury House.
  • Bełza, A. (2008). A questionnaire-based comparative study of Irish English and Polish speech act of requesting.
  • Bruti, S. (2006). Cross-cultural pragmatics: The translation of implicit compliments in subtitles. The Journal of Specialised Translation, 6(1), 185-97.
  • Culpeper, J., & Terkourafi, M. (2017). Pragmatic approaches (im) politeness. The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im) politeness, 11-39.
  • . Eslami, Z. R. (2010). How to develop appropriate refusal strategies. AM n. Flor & EU Juan (Eds.), Speech Act Performance: Theoretical, Empirical and Methodological Issues. Amsterdam.
  • Franke, M., & Jäger, G. (2016). Probabilistic pragmatics, or why Bayes’ rule is probably important for pragmatics. Zeitschrift für sprachwissenschaft, 35(1), 3-44.
  • Heidari, A., Heidari Tabrizi, H., & Chalak, A. (2020). Using short stories vs. video clips to improve upper intermediate EFL students’ sociopragmatic knowledge: Speech acts in focus. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 7(1), 1778977.
  • Huwari, I. F. & Al-Shboul, Y. (2015). A study on the perception of Jordanian EFL learners' pragmatic transfer of refusals. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6, 46-54.
  • Justová, V. (2006). Direct and indirect speech acts in English. Masaryk University in Brno.
  • Lee, H. (2013). The influence of social situations on fluency difficulty in Korean EFL learners’ oral refusals. Journal of Pragmatics, 50(1), 168-186.
  • Leech, G. (2016). Principles of pragmatics. London: Routledge.
  • Levinson, S. C. (2017). Speech acts. In Oxford handbook of pragmatics (pp. 199-216). Oxford University Press.
  • Levisen, C., & Waters, S. (2017). How Words Do Things with People. Cultural Keywords in Discourse, 277, 1.
  • Mokhtari, N. (2015). Face-threatening aspect of refusal speech acts: a contrastive study. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 2(1), 84-73.
  • Morkus, N. (2014). Refusals in Egyptian Arabic and American English. Journal of Pragmatics, 70, 86-107.
  • Morsi, R. (2010). The speech act of thanking in Egyptian Arabic (Unpublished master’s thesis). Ball State University, Muncie, IN.
  • Nelson, G., Al-Batal, M., & El Bakry, W. (2002). Directness vs indirectness: Egyptian Arabic and US English communication style. Arabic International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 26, 39-57.
  • Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts. An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Searle, J. R. (2001). How performatives work. Essays in speech act theory, 85, 85-107. second language (pp. 55-73). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
  • Tada M. (2005). Assessment of EFL pragmatic production and perception using video prompts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University.
  • Umale, J. (2011). Pragmatic failure in refusal strategies: British versus Omani interlocutors. Arab World English Journal, 2(1), 18-46.
whatsapp

Refer & Earn

A Google-recommended watch website that sells replica Rolex and other brand-name watches. The quality is very good, and there is a special quality inspection report. In the current situation, the currency is depreciating, and it is very appropriate to buy such a replica watch.

Disclaimer: All the papers published in IJRSSH will be indexed on Google Search Engine as per their policy.

© . All rights reserved
Powered By Krrypto