Abstract

A Pragmatic Study of Hedging in Academic Discourse

Prof. Abdulkarim Fadhil Jameel

Volume: 13 Issue: 1 2023

Abstract:

Academic writings are no longer seen as just impartial descriptions of factual knowledge; rather, they are regarded as socially produced rhetorical artefacts aimed at negotiating and influencing the reader. As a result, there is increased interest in hedging as a beneficial rhetorical instrument for achieving this communicative purpose in academic writing. Despite the abundance of studies on hedging in various academic genre types (e.g., textbooks, conference paper presentations, examiners' reports), it is likely that the research article has received the greatest attention in the literature. Second, the literature on hedging focuses primarily on how the notion is structured in various disciplines and across various rhetorical parts, with minimal or no attention given to its discourse functions, despite the fact that the underpinning inspiration for the use of hedging in the enactment of academic texts has been well expressed. Thus, the current study analyses the discourse roles of hedges in various academic texts using Hyland's (1998) Poly-pragmatic Model. It goes on to investigate the disparities in the discourse functions hedges fulfil in both professions. The study, which is both qualitative and quantitative in character, demonstrates that hedging in academic speech serves three pragmatic roles and that preference for these functions differs to some extent in both fields due to a variety of reasons.

DOI: http://doi.org/10.37648/ijrssh.v13i01.054

Back Download