Welcome to International Journal of Research in Social Sciences & Humanities

E-ISSN : 2249 - 4642 | P-ISSN: 2454 - 4671

IMPACT FACTOR: 8.561

Abstract

AGAINST COMPASSIONATE MISREADING: ARUNDHATI ROY, ADIVASI DISPOSSESSION, AND THE POLITICS OF REFUSAL

Pankaj Sharma

Volume: 5 Issue: 2 2015

Receiving Date: 2015-05-21 | Acceptance Date: 2015-06-19 | Publication Date: 2015-06-29

Abstract:

Indian criticism has largely received Arundhati Roy’s writing on adivasi dispossession as the protest of a conscience — a novelist moved by suffering, faulted chiefly for excess. This paper argues that the reception is a misreading, and that the misreading is doing political work. Roy’s essays on Bastar and on mineral extraction hold a consistent left position: that the dispossession of adivasi India is not a failure of governance but the ordinary operation of capital, with the state acting as its instrument. Three bodies of evidence are read here — the property argument running through Walking with the Comrades and Broken Republic, the attack on philanthropic capital in Capitalism: A Ghost Story, and the assault on Gandhian reformism in The Doctor and the Saint. Each is a refusal of reform rather than a demand for it. The paper tests the claim against the strongest counter-readings, including the charge that Roy has no programme and no party, and argues that constancy of object, not doctrinal fidelity, is what the description requires. Reading Roy as a conscience disarms her admirers and lets her critics avoid the argument she is actually making.

Back Download

References

  • Alam, Jayanti. “Water, Not for Private Ownership.” Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 39, no. 30, 24 July 2004.
  • Ambedkar, B. R. Annihilation of Caste: The Annotated Critical Edition. Edited by S. Anand, introduction by Arundhati Roy, Navayana, 2014.
  • Guha, Ramachandra. “The Arun Shourie of the Left.” The Hindu, 26 Nov. 2000.
  • ---. “Perils of Extremism.” The Hindu, 17 Dec. 2000.
  • M.C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath, (1997) 1 SCC 388. Supreme Court of India.
  • Manohar Lal Sharma v. The Principal Secretary and Others. Supreme Court of India, judgment of 25 Aug. 2014 and order of 24 Sept. 2014.
  • Nandini Sundar and Others v. State of Chhattisgarh. Supreme Court of India, 5 July 2011.
  • Nixon, Rob. Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Harvard University Press, 2011.
  • Padel, Felix, and Samarendra Das. Out of This Earth: East India Adivasis and the Aluminium Cartel. Orient Blackswan, 2010.
  • Roy, Arundhati. Broken Republic: Three Essays. Hamish Hamilton, 2011.
  • ---. Capitalism: A Ghost Story. Verso, 2014.
  • ---. Walking with the Comrades. Penguin, 2011.
  • Singh, Manmohan. “PM’s Speech at the Chief Ministers’ Meet on Naxalism.” Prime Minister’s Office, Apr. 2006.
  • Sundar, Nandini. Subalterns and Sovereigns: An Anthropological History of Bastar, 1854–1996. Oxford University Press, 1997.
whatsapp

Refer & Earn

Disclaimer: Indexing of published papers is subject to the evaluation and acceptance criteria of the respective indexing agencies. While we strive to maintain high academic and editorial standards, International Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities does not guarantee the indexing of any published paper. Acceptance and inclusion in indexing databases are determined by the quality, originality, and relevance of the paper, and are at the sole discretion of the indexing bodies.

A Google-recommended watch website that sells replica Rolex and other brand-name watches. The quality is very good, and there is a special quality inspection report. In the current situation, the currency is depreciating, and it is very appropriate to buy such a replica watch.
© . All rights reserved
Powered By Krrypto