Abstract

FRAMING THE PUBLIC DEBATE OVER THE CROSS-STRAIT ECONOMIC COOPERATION FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT

Hsiu Ching Ko

Volume: 5 Issue: 4 2015

Abstract:

This study examines how frames were used in President Ma Ying-Jeou’s political discourse in the ECFA debate with Tsai, the Chairperson of the Democratic Progressive Party. Scholars portray framing as an optimal rhetoric strategy and weapon against a political opponent that can influence and shape public opinion. In the present study, President Ma Ying-Jeou’s discourse in the ECFA debate with Tsai is analyzed with respect to diagnostic, prognostic, and motivational framing. Results show that safety, responsibility, crisis, and incompetence frames are the primary strategies that Ma Ying-Jeou utilizes to gain public support for signing an ECFA with China during the debate.

Back Download

References

• Austen-Smith, D. (1993). Information acquisition and orthogonal argument. In W. A. Barnett., M. Hintch, & N. Schofield (Eds.), Political Economy: Institutions Competition and Representation, proceedings of the seventh international symposium in economic theory and econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing process and social movement theory: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611-639.
• Borrelli, S. A., & Lockerbie, B. (2008). Framing effects on public opinion during prewar and major combat phases of the U.S. wars with Iraq. Social Science Quarterly, 89 (2), 502-522.
• Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Teaching the spoken language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
• Campella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press.
• De Castella, K., McGarty, C., & Musgrove, L. (2009). Fear appeals in political rhetoric about terrorism: An analysis of speeches by Australian Prime Minister Howard. Political Psychology, 30(1), 1-26.
• de Vreese, C. H., der Brug. W. V., & Hobolt, S. (2012). Turkey in the EU?: How cultural and economic frames affect support for Turkish accession. Comparative European Politics, 10 (2), 218-235.
• Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51-58.
• Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse in language. New York: Pantheon Books.
• Gamson, W. A., Croteau, D., Hoynes, W., & Sasson, T. (1992). Media images and the social construction of reality. Annual review of sociology, 18, 373-393.
• Glassner, B. (2004). Narrative techniques of fear mongering. Social Research, 71, 819-826.
• Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Jacoby, W. G. (2000).Issue framing and public opinion on government spending. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 750-767.
• Jerit, J. (2008). Issue framing and engagement: Rhetorical strategy in public policy debates. Polit Behav, 30, 1-24.
• Kinder, D. R., & Sanders, L. M. (1996). Divided by color: Racial politics and democratic ideals. University of Chicago Press.
• Ko, S. L., Chao, Y., & Mo. Y. C. (2010, April 27). Tsai questions Ma on job losses from signing ECFA. Taipei Times. Retrieved March 20, 2015, from http://www.taipeitimes.com
• Lakoff, G. (2003). Framing the dems: How conservatives control political debate and how progressives can take it back. American Prospect, 14, 32-34.
• Lau, R. R., Smith, R. A., & Fiske, S. T. (1991). Political beliefs, policy interpretations, and political persuasion. Journal of Politics, 53, 644-675.
• Lin, J. L. (2000). 語藝批評:理論與實務〔Rhetoric critics: Theory and practice〕. Taipei: Wu-Nan Book Inc.
• McCombs, M., & Ghanem, S. I. ( 2001). The coverage of agenda setting and framing. In S. D. Reese, O. S. Gandy, Jr., & A. E. Grant. Mahwah (Eds.), Framing Public Life (pp. 67-82). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Mo, Y. C., & Loa, L. S. (2010, April 26). Ma, Tsai lock horns in ECFA debate. Taipei Times. Retrieved March 20, 2015, from http://www.taipeitimes.com
• Nicholson, S. P., & Howard, R. M. (2003). Framing support for the Supreme Court in the aftermath of Bush v. Gore. The Journal of Politics, 65 (3), 673-695.
• Nelson, T. E. (2004).Policy goals, public rhetoric, and political attitudes. Journal of Politics, 66, 581-605.
• Nelson, T. E., & Kinder, D. R. (1996).Issue frames and group-centrism in American public opinion. Journal of Politics, 58, 1055-1078.
• Nelson, T. E., Oxley, Z., & Clawson, R. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review, 91, 567-583.
• Peng, H. E. (2007). 政治傳播:理論與實務﹝ Political communication: Theory and practice﹞. Taipei: Feng Yun Forum Inc.
• Popkewitz, T. S., & Brennan, M. (Eds.) (1998). Foucault's challenge: Discourse, knowledge, and power in education. New York: Teachers College Press.
• Reese, S. D. (1991). Setting the media’s agenda: A power balance perspective. Communication Yearbook, 14, 309-340.
• Riker, W. H. (1996). The strategy of rhetoric: Campaigning for the American constitution. New Haven: Yale University Press.
• Roggeband, C., & Vliegenthart, R. (2007).Divergent framing: The public debate on migration in the Dutch parliament and media, 1995-2004. West European Politics, 30(3), 524-548
• Simon, A. F. (2002).The winning message: Candidate behavior, candidate discourse, and democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
• Tynkkynen, L. K., Lehto, J., & Miettinen, S. (2012). Framing the decision to contract out elderly care and primary health care services – perspectives of local level politicians and civil servants in Finland. BMC Services Research, 12, 201-214.
• Tzang, G. R. (1999). 新聞媒體與消息來源: 媒介框架與真實建構之論述〔News Media and Source of Information: Discourse of Media Framing and Reality Construction〕. Taipei: San Min Book Co.
• van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
• Williamson, J., McNamara, T. K., & Howling, S.T. (2003). Generational equity, generational interdependence, and framing the debate over social security reform. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, (3), 3-13.
• Winter, N. J. G. (2006). Beyond welfare: Framing and the recialization of white opinion on social security. American Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 400-420.
• Wu, D. (2002). 公共行政辭典〔Dictionary of Public Administration〕. Taipei: Wu-Nan Book Inc.
• Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.