Abstract

PEER SCAFFOLDING AND ITS EFFECTS ON READING COMPREHENSION: EVIDENCE FROM ETHIOPIA

Daniel Worku Demissie

Volume: 8 Issue: 3 2018

Abstract:

The influence of peers and working with them is widely accepted as an effective mechanism for the better educational outcomes. The teaching and learning activities became more vibrant and interesting when taught and learnt in the group with peers. Taking into consideration of the growing importance of peer scaffolding, the present study was aimed to investigate its effect on students’ reading comprehension. Further, the participants’ evaluation of social validity of the intervention was also assessed. The intervention and study was carried out among first year medicine students in University of Gondar, which is one of prominent universities of Ethiopia. A non -equivalent pre-test post-test quasi-experimental design was employed. The experimental group was consists of 44 students in which seven were chosen as scaffolders and thirty seven was scaffoldees. The control group consists of seven group leaders and 36 learners. Both the groups were assessed for reading comprehension at the pre and post levels. Seven students from each group who have scored higher than their fellows in the pre-tests were selected as scaffolders and group leaders in respective groups. The experimental and control group were randomly divided into seven groups under these selected scaffolders and group leaders. Both experimental and control groups were involved in small group reading comprehension activities for six weeks. However, the scaffolders undergone scaffolding strategies training for 15 hours. The six techniques of scaffolding: feeding back, Hints, Instructing, Explaining, modeling, and questioning were employed in the training. The peer scaffolding model adopted in the study was based on Vygotsky’s socio cultural theory. The social validity questionnaires were administered at the post-intervention stage. The findings of the study revealed that the scaffolders and scaffoldees showed greater pre-to-postintervention improvement in reading comprehension and rated the intervention as socially valid. Thus, the study assured the efficacy of peer scaffolding intervention as feasible tool to enhance reading comprehension achievement.

Back Download

References

• Aarnoutse, C. A, & Van Leeuwe, J. F. (2000). Development of poor and better readers during the primary school. Educational Research and Evaluation, 6, 251–278.
• Alvermann, D, & Earle, J. (2003). Comprehension instruction. In A. P. Sweet, & C. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 12-30). New York: Guilford.
• Ankrum, J. W., Genest, M. T., Belcastro, E. G. (2014). The power of verbal scaffolding: “Showing” beginning readers how to use reading strategies. Early Childhood Education Journal, 42, 39–47.
• Applebee, A. N., Langer, J. A. (1983). Instructional scaffolding: Reading and writing as natural language activities. Language Arts, 60, 168–175.
• Azeez, A. E. P. (2015). Positive mental health through life skill education: empowering adolescents having psychosocial problems, Journal of Psychosocial Research, 10 (1), 21– 31.
• Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Meta cognitive skills in reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353–394). New York: Longman University Press.
• Beed, P. L., Hawkins, E. M., Roller, C. M. (1991). Moving learners toward independence: The power of scaffolded instruction. The Reading Teacher, 44, 648–655.
• Black & Finn, (1996). Multiple Choice tests in English Language.
• Clark, K. F., Graves, M. F. (2005). Scaffolding students‟ comprehension of text. The Reading Teacher, 58, 570–580.
• Cole, A. D. (2006). Scaffolding beginning readers: Micro and macro cues teachers use during student oral reading. Reading Teacher, 59, 450–459.
• Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. (1998). What reading does for the mind? American Educator, 22(1–2), 8–1. Retrieved from http://www.csun.edu
• Dole, J. A. (2000). Explicit and implicit instruction in comprehension. Reading for meaning: Fostering comprehension in the middle grades, 52-69.
• Dubale Lawgaw. (1990.) The impact of reading ability in English on the performance of some content subjects ( Unpublished master„s thesis). Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa.
• Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61, 239–264. doi: 1170536
• Eckert, T. L. & Hintze, J. M. (2000). Behavioral conceptions and applications of acceptability: issues related to service delivery and research methodology. School of Psychology Quarterly, 15(2), 123- 148.
• Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., Hoffman, M. B. & Miller, R. (1980). Instrumental Enrichment. Baltimore: Park University Press.
• Finn, C. A. & Sladeczek, I. E. (2001). Assessing the social validity of behavioral interventions: A review of treatment acceptability measures. School Psychology Quarterly, 16(2), 176-206. doi: 10.1521/scpq.16.2.176.18703
• Gresham, F. M. (1989). Assessment of treatment integrity in school consultation and peripheral intervention. School Psychology Review, 18(1), 37-50.
• Hogan, K. and Pressley, M. (Eds). (1997). Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books
• Josephs, N. L. (2010) Using peer-mediated fluency instruction to address the needs of adolescent struggling readers. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Georgia State University. Retrieved from http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu
• Judith .R. B (2007). The study examining the impact of scaffolding young children’s acquisition of literacy in primary grades (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Louisiana state university. Louisiana.
• Kirsch, I.S., Jungeblut, A., Jenkins, L. and Kolstad, A. (1993). Adult literacy in America: A first look at the results of the National Adult Literacy Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
• Light brown, P. & Spada, N. (1993). How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Mesfin Derash, (2008). The practice of teaching reading in English at first cycle primary schools: Grade four in focus (Unpublished master„s thesis). Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa.
• Pawan, F. (2008). Content-area teachers and scaffolded instruction for English language learners. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1450–1462.
• Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press
• Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
• Seely, J. (1983) Reading with understanding: a comprehension course.
• Sweet, A. P. & Snow, C. (2002 ). Reconceptualizing reading comprehension. In C.C. Block, L. B. Gambrell, & M. Pressley (Eds.) Improving Comprehension Instruction: Rethinking Research (pp. 54-79) Newark, DE, International Reading Association.
• Tesfamichael Getu. (2011). A Survey of WoldyaHigher Education PreparatorySecondary School Eleventh grade Students Reading Comprehension Performance (un published Masters thesis).
• Udaka, I. J. (2009). Cross-age peer tutoring in dialogic reading: effects on the language development of young children (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Massachusetts, Massachusetts.
• Valsiner, J., & van der Veer, R. (1993). The encoding of distance: The concept of the zone of proximal development and its interpretations. In R. R. Cockney & K. A. Renninger (Eds.), The development and meaning of psychological distance (pp.35–62). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind in society: The development of t h e higher psychological process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144-188). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. In A. Kozulin (trans.) (Ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203- 214. doi: jaba00109.