Abstract

INVESTIGATION OF THE ROLE OF RHETORICAL PATTERNS ON THE EFL STUDENTS PERFORMANCE IN READING COMPREHENSION

Asst. Prof. Nagham Qadoori Yahya, Zubaida Sameer Aayed Al-Obaidy

Volume: 8 Issue: 3 2018

Abstract:

The knowledge of text structure may be considered as an important aid to facilitate students comprehension and learning from text. This study aims at investigating the role of rhetorical patterns and their types on Iraqi (EFL) students' performance in reading comprehension, finding out whether there are significant differences between the experimental group and the control in the post-test, and pointing out whether there are significant differences in achievement scores according to gender variable of experimental group in the post-test. It is hypothesized that there is a role for the rhetorical patterns and their types using in the text’s structures on the EFL students' performance in reading comprehension, there are no statistically significant differences between the experimental group mean scores, that is taught Meyer's rhetorical patterns; and the control group mean scores, that is not taught Meyer's rhetorical patterns on their performance in reading comprehension in the post-test, and there are statistically significant differences between males' and females' performance of experimental group in the post-test. To fulfil the aims of the study and to verify the hypothesis, fifty two university students have been selected from 3rd year to be the sample of the study divided into two equal groups: twenty six students represent the experimental group (taught Meyer's rhetorical patterns) and twenty six students represent the control group (did not receive any teaching of Meyer'srhetorical patterns). The two groups have been equalized in terms of age, level of parent's education, pre-test scores, and students' average scores in the previous year. After the instruction for six weeks, a performance test has been constructed and applied. The performance of these two groups was compared using T-test formula for two independent samples and T-test formula for paired sample. It has been found that students in the experimental group perform better than those in the control group and showed a clear difference in comprehension level between the two groups with the superiority of the experimental group. Rhetorical patterns teaching haveimproved students' performance obviously. Results obtained from this study indicate that the knowledge of text structure by teaching rhetorical patterns has facilitated the students' comprehension and learning from text. Finally, on the basis of the results outlined earlier, a number of recommendations and suggestions have been given such as the explicit teaching of academic text structure which contains the rhetorical patterns implicitly and the effective use of such patterns could be inserted in the instructional program of English language teaching as a foreign language.

Back Download

References

• Alexander, L. G. (1965).Essay and Letter Writing.London: Longman.
• Al-Qaraghooly, D. A.(1996).The Effect of the Learners' Pre-Knowledge of Behavioral Objectives on Their Achievement in English.Unpublished M.A. Thesis, University of Baghdad.
• Bachman, L. F. (1990).Fundamental Considerations in LanguageTesting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Best, J.W. (1970).Research in Education.(2nded). New York: Prentice
• (1981).Research in Education.(4thed). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
• Bloom, B. S. (1971).Human Characteristics and School Learning. New York: McGrawHall Book.
• Brown, F. G. (1981).Measuring Classroom Achievement. New York: Addison Wesley. Inc.
• Carrell, P. L. (2006) .Introduction: Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Carrell, P.L. and Eisterhold, J.C. (1983).Schema Theory and ESL Reading Pedagogy.Cambridge: CUP.
• Christensen, L. B. (1980).Experimental Methodology.(2nded). Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
• Connor, U. (1996).Contrastive Rhetoric: Cross-Cultural Aspects of Second Language Writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Connor, U. (1996).Contrastive Rhetoric: Cross-Cultural Aspects of Second Language Writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Cook, L. K. (1983).Instructional Effects of Text Structure-Based Reading Strategies on the Comprehension of Scientific Prose.Unpublished doctoral dissertation, university of California, Santa Barbara.www.jimsjournal.org/Maryam-Heydari.pdf.
• Davies, A. (1990).Principles of Language Testing. Cambridge: Blackwell Ltd.
• Difficult words Dictionaries .2008. Online: available at: www. Helicon. Co. uk/ Prmt/titles/catalogue/ difficult. htm.
• Ebel, R. L. (1972).Essentials of Educational Measurement. New Jersey: Prentice- Hall, Inc.
• Good, C. (1959).Dictionary of Education.(2nded). New York: McGraw Hill Com.
• Grabe, W. (2002).Dilemmas for the Development of Second Language Reading Activity.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• (2009).Reading in Asecond Language Moving from Theory to Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Harris, D. P. (1969).Testing English as a Second Language. New York: McGraw.
• Heaton, J. B. (1975).Writing English Language Test. London: Longman Group Ltd. Hedges, W. D. (1966).Testing and Evaluation for Sciences. California: Wordsworth.
• Hughes, A. (1989).Testing for Language Teacher.Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.
• Koda, K. (2005).Insights into Second Language Reading: A Cross-Linguistic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Lewis, R. and Meed J. (1986).Examination English. London: Pan Books Ltd.
• Mehren, W. and Lehman I. J. (1984).Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
• Meyer, B. J. F. (1975).The Organization of Prose and Its Effects on Memory.Amsterdam: North Holland American Elsevier publishing Co.
• -(1979).Organizational Patterns in Prose and Their Use in Reading. SC:
• (1984).Organizational Aspects of Text: Effects on Reading Comprehension and Applications for the Classroom. In J. Flood (Ed.) , Promoting reading comprehension.
• Meyer, B. J. F.and Freedle, R. O. (1984).'Effects of discourse type on recall'. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 121- 143
• Nunnaly, J. C. (1972).Educational Measurement and Evaluation.(2nded). New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
• Ornstein, R. E. (1972).The Psychology of Consciousness. San Francisco: Freeman.
• Richards, J. C. (2001).Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge press.
• Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Toward an Interactive Model of Reading.New York: Academic Press.
• Sharp, A. (2003).Reading Comprehension and Text Organization. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.
• Stanely, C. J. and Hopkins, K. D. (1972).Educational and PsychologicalMeasurement and Evaluation.New Jersey: Prentice- Hall.
• Taylor, B. M. and Samuels, S. J. (1983).'Children's Use of Text Structure in the Recall of expositorymaterial'. American Educational Research Journal, 20,(517)
• Van, D. (1962).Understanding Educational Research. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.