Abstract

MEASUREMENT OF BEHAVIORAL COMPLEXITY LEVELS IN THE GENERAL COMMISSION FOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Yasar Farooq Faisal, Ali HassounFendi

Volume: 9 Issue: 2 2019

Abstract:

The objective of this research is to investigate the behavioral complexity of the GSO. The sample was chosen for this purpose and included the employees in the departments that depend on the work of the work teams. Therefore, we gave 109 questionnaires to the employees. Statistical methods were used to measure behavioral complexity as well as standard deviation and mean. The results indicated that the senior management in the body investigated has a clear behavioral differentiation with the employees, especially in terms of change according to the employees' behavior, according to the organizational position and according to the employees and their different personalities. However, there is some decline by senior management in the practice of behavior (router, negotiator and coordinator).

Back Download

References

• Cenac, J. (2014). The Relationship between Learned Resourcefulness, Cultural Intelligence, and Behavioral Repertoire among Organizational Leaders. Unpublished Doctoral Degree, Regent University.Cenac, J. (2014). The Relationship between Learned Resourcefulness, Cultural Intelligence, and Behavioral Repertoire among Organizational Leaders. Unpublished Doctoral Degree, Regent University.
• Denison, D. R., Hooijberg, R., & Quinn, R. E. (1995). Paradox and performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organization Science, 6(5), 524-540.
• Denison, D. R., Hooijberg, R., & Quinn, R. E. (1995). Paradox and performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organization Science, 6(5), 524-540.
• Hart, S. L., & Quinn, R. E. (1993). Roles executives play: CEOs, behavioral complexity, and firm performance. Human Relations, 46(5), 543–574
• Hooijberg, R. (1996). A Multidirectional approach toward leadership: An extension of the concept of behavioral complexity. Human Relations, 49(7), 917-946.
• Hooijberg, R., Hunt, J., & Dodge, G. (1997). Leadership complexity and development of the leaderplex model. Journal of Management, 23(3), 375-408.
• Lawrence, K. A., Lenk, P., Quinn, R. E. (2009). Behavioral complexity in leadership: The psychometric properties of a new instrument to measure behavioral repertoire. The leadership quarterly, 20, 87-102.
• McCarthy, I. (2012). Doctor of Philosophy 'The complexity of leadership and organizations'. Published Dissertation, ASTON UNIVERSITY, Birmingham.
• Mitchinson, A. G. (2016). Predictably Flexible Leadership: Exploring the effect of Leader Behavioral Breadth, Variability and Authenticity on Follower Perceptions of Leader Trustworthiness and Effectiveness. Published Dissertation. The Graduate School of Arts and
• Satish, U. (1997). Behavioral Complexity: A Review. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1997, 27, 23, pp. 2047-2067. V. H. Winston i3 Son, Inc. All rights reserved
• Wangler, V. E. (2009). Connective leadership, behavioral complexity, and managerial effectiveness. The Claremont Graduate University. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
• Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). The nature of executive leadership: A conceptual and empirical analysis of success. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Zaccaro, S. J., &Klimoski, R. (2001). The nature of organizational leadership: Understanding the performance imperatives confronting today’s leaders. Jossey-Bass. A Wiley Company. San Francisco