![]() |
||
Welcome to International Journal of Research in Social Sciences & HumanitiesE-ISSN : 2249 - 4642 | P-ISSN: 2454 - 4671 IMPACT FACTOR: 8.561 |
Abstract
PERSUASION IN MEDIA
Alia Jawad Almagsosi, Dr. Khalida H.Alghezzy
Volume: 10 Issue: 3 2020
Abstract:
In a broad sense, persuasion could be stated as a literary technique used to influence the audience. Persuasion may simply use an argument to persuade the readers, or sometimes may persuade readers to perform a certain action. Simply, it is an art of effective speaking and writing in which writers make their opinions believable to the audience through logic, by invoking emotions, and by proving their own credibility. The popular philosophers, Plato and Aristotle, set up the reality that individuals require a sense of communication so as to alter anything they need to. Subsequently, the process of persuasion is considered a phonetic apparatus of communication and individuals have free choices to choose since they are represented by their minds and feelings. The method of influence is basically built on three tomahawks, notably the persuader, the persuader, and the influential message .From now on, for such process to be fruitful, the center of consideration isn't only directed on the persuader or the maker, though his/her part is so vital, but rather on the persuader or the collector, and how s/he gets it the displayed persuasive message. Besides, influence is utilized as a apparatus for individual pick up under many public claims. Individuals in control can do such handle, as a result such prepare is so critical in political spaces, the show ponder bargains with political persuasion in race campaigns.
References
- HandayaniMediana, DosenTidakTetap. (2011).Introduction to persuasion.p.4 Larson, Charles U. (2010) Persuasion: Reception and Responsibility.(12 ed.). Northern Illinois University .Emeritus.
- Mc Curie, W.J.(1964). Inducing resistance to persuasion in contemporary approaches
- Mc Curie, W.J.(1964). Inducing resistance to persuasion in contemporary approaches
- Matthews, P.H.(2005).Oxford Concise Dictionary of Linguistics. New York: Oxford. University Press.
- O'Keefe, D.J.(1990).Persuasion : Theory and research .Newbury Park, CA: Sage. ---------------(2003). Message properties, mediating states, and manipulation checks: Claims, evidence, and data analysis in experimental persuasive message effects research. Communication Theory, vol. 13
- Perloff ,R.M. ( 2003).The Dynamics of Persuasion: Communication and Attitudes in the 21st Century(2nd ed.). ISBN.
- Rank ,Haugh(1976).Teaching about Public Persuasion ,In Daniel Dietrich (ed.),Teaching about Doublespeak, Illinois :National Council of Teachers of English .
- - (1991).The Pitch: How to analyze Ads.2nd edition .USA publication.
- Rhodes,N.,&eWoldsen, D.R.(1997).Attitude accessibility and persuasion: Review and a transactive model. In B Burleson (ed.), Communication Yearbook20.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Scudder Joseph N. Social Scientific approach to persuasion . In Charles U. Larson (2010) Persuasion: Reception and Responsibility.(12 ed.). Northern Illinois University .Emeritus.
- Sexton, Jeff (2010).Powerful Social Media Persuasion Techniques..Free Social Media Marketing Industry Report. February 11. Website Optimization .pp. 1-3.
- Smith,M.,J. (1982) Persuasion and Human Action: A Review and critique of Social Influence Theories. Belmont,CA: Wadsworth.
- Stacy Wedia, Karl Stolley,(2013),Feb.11, 12:56:30. Using Rhetorical Strategies for Persuasion.P.1-2
- Straker, David (2016) How we can change what others think, feel ,believe and do. Three types of Persuasion .Changing Minds Org. In Changing Minds in detail.pp. 1-3 .
- --(2012) How we can change what others think ,feel, believe and do. Rank's Intensify/ Downplay Schema. Changing Minds Org. In Changing Minds in detail.pp. 1-3.
- --(2016)How we can change what others think ,feel, believe and do .Four Persuasion Styles. Changing Minds Org.In Changing Minds in detail .pp. 1-4
- Stranzy ,Ph(2005).Encyclopedias of Linguistics .New York: Taylor and Francis book. Inc.
- Thornborrow , Joanna ( 2001) Power Talk. Language and Interaction in Institutional Discourse.Longman. England. London. New York.
- Vanderveken& Susumu Kubo(2001).Essays in Speech Act Theory (eds.) John Benjamins , Amsterdam Philadelphi
- Westen Drew(2007). The Political Brain :The role of emotion in deciding the fate of the nation..New York, NY .Public Affairs Books.

Refer & Earn |