Abstract

The Impact of KWL Strategy on College EFL Students' Reading Comprehension Achievement

Majid Bani Madhi

Volume: 11 Issue: 2 2021

Abstract:

Iraqi EFL learners face difficulties in comprehending English language reading texts. It is well-established that the teaching strategies focusing on the nature of reading comprehension process are more effective than traditional methods when seeking to achieve a better comprehension of foreign language texts. This study investigates the impact of the KWL strategy on the college EFL students' reading comprehension achievement. KWL (Ogle, 1986) is an instructional reading method utilized to guide students while reading a text. Students brainstorm the whole thing they Know about a topic. This information is written down in the K column of a K-W-L chart. A list of questions about what they Want to Know about the topic is then developed. These questions are set out in the W column of the chart. During or after reading, students answer the questions that are in the W column. This new information that they have Learned is recorded in the L column of the K-W-L chart. To achieve the aim of this study, a sample selected randomly from the first-grade students, the department of English, Al-Imam Al-Kadhum Private University College, Misan, Iraq. Ninety-two males and females participated in the study and were distributed equally to an experimental group and a control group. Both groups were pretested to determine their achievement level and make sure that they are homogenous. The students in the experimental group were taught reading comprehension by the K.W.L strategy, while the control group were taught by a conventional method. Pre- and post-reading comprehension tests were managed to collect data. The data were analyzed using a two-sample t-test. The findings reveal the superiority of the experimental group students in the reading comprehension post-test over their peers in the control group. Therefore, the strategy can be beneficial for students’ reading comprehension. This study is a call for teachers to utilize new strategies and techniques for teaching reading comprehension. Moreover, it urges curriculum designers to develop new reading comprehension textbooks coping with such beneficial strategies, e.g., WKL strategy.

DOI: http://doi.org/10.37648/ijrssh.v11i02.001

Back Download

References

• Abu Humos, O. (2012). An evaluative analysis of comprehension questions’ level of difficulty: A case of 12th grade Palestinian English student’s textbook. An- Najah Univ. J. Res. (Humanities), 26(3), 767–788.
• Aebersold, J. A., & Field, M. L. (1997). From Reader to Reading Teacher: Issues and Strategies for Second Language Classrooms (Cambridge Language Education) (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press.
• Alexander, L.G. (1970). Developing Skills: An Integrated Course for Intermediate Students. Longman Group Limited.
• Alhaisoni, E. (2017). Prior Knowledge in EFL Reading Comprehension: Native and Nonnative EFL Teachers’ Perceptions, Classroom Strategies and Difficulties Encountered. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature, 5(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.20431/2347- 3134.0501004
• Al-Issa, A. (2006). Schema Theory and L2 Reading Comprehension: Implications for Teaching. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC), 3(7), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v3i7.1700
• Al-Jahwari, Y. (2014). Prior Knowledge in EFL Reading Comprehension: Omani Teachers’ Perspectives & Classroom Strategies. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 4(1), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.1p.169
• Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (2006). Research in Education (3rd ed.). Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
• Block, E. (1986). The Comprehension Strategies of Second Language Readers. TESOL Quarterly, 20(3), 463–494. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586295
• Brassell, D., Rasinski, T., & Yopp, H. K. (2008). Comprehension That Works. Shell Education.
• Brown, D. H. (2007). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy (3rd ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
• Carrell, P. L. (1984). The Effects of Rhetorical Organization on ESL Readers. TESOL Quarterly, 18(3), 441–469. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586714
• Chou, P. T. (2011). The Effects of Vocabulary Knowledge and Background Knowledge on Reading Comprehension of Taiwanese EFL Students. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching - National University of Singapore 8(1),108–115.
• Day, R., & Park, J. (2005). Developing Reading Comprehension Questions. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17(1), 60–73.
• Duckworth, A. L. (2009). (Over and) beyond high-stakes testing. American Psychologist, 64(4), 279–280. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014923
• Fritz, M. (2002). Using a Reading Strategy to Foster Active Learning in Content Area Courses. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 32(2), 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2002.10850298
• Hart, B., & Risley, T. (2003). The Early Catastrophe. The 30 Million Word Gap. American Educator, 27(1), 4–9.
• Holmes, B., & Roser, N. (1987). Five Ways to Assess Readers’ Prior Knowledge. Reading Teacher, 40(7), 646–649.
• Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00401799
• Ismini, R. (2003). The Effectiveness of Reading Strategy Training in Developing Students’ Reading Ability. Elementary School Journal, 92(5), 513–555.
• Kitao, K.S. (1990). Textual Schemata and English Language Learning. Cross Currents, 40(3), 147-155
• Koda, K. (2007). Reading and Language Learning: Crosslinguistic Constraints on Second Language Reading Development. Language Learning, 57(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.101997010-i1
• Li, X. H., Wu, J., & Wang, W. H. (2007). Analysis of schema theory and its influence on reading. US-China Foreign Language, 5(11), 18–21.
• Mamugudubi, K. (2014). Learning and the Use of Smart Phone Devices: An experimental Case Study in a Gauteng Secondary School [Unpublished M.A. Thesis, Stellenbosch University]
• Nor, N., & Rashid, R. (2018). A review of theoretical perspectives on language learning and acquisition. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(1), 161–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2017.12.012
• Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English Language Teaching PELT Text (A Course in English Language Teaching) (1st ed.). McGraw-Hill Education
• Ogle, D. M. (1986). K-W-L: A Teaching Model That Develops Active Reading of Expository Text. The Reading Teacher, 39(6), 564–570. https://doi.org/10.1598/rt.39.6.11
• Opp-Beckman, L. & Klinghammer, S. (2006). Shaping the Way We Teach English: Successful Practices Around the World, Instructors’ manual. Washington: Office of Language programs. http://englishprograms.state.gov
• Shelly, A. C., Bridwell, B., Hyder, L., Ledford, N., & Patterson, P. (1997). Revisiting the KW-L: What we Knew; What we Wanted to Know; What we Learned. Reading Horizons: A Journal of Literacy and Language Arts, 37 (3). Retrieved from https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol37/iss3/5
• Scott, K. (2008). The Effects of Three Instructional Methods on the Reading Comprehension and Content Acquisition of Novice Readers. Journal of Literacy Research, 40(3), 359–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862960802520594
• Taylor, R. T. (2006). Improving Reading, Writing, and Content Learning for Students in Grades 4-12 (1st ed.). Corwin.
• Usman, B., Fata, I., & Pratiwi, R. (2019). TEACHING READING THROUGH KNOWWANT-LEARNED (KWL) STRATEGY: The effects and benefits. Englisia Journal, 6(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v6i1.3607
• Vora, P. (2006). A Comparative Study of Different Views about Reading Comprehension. In S. Tiwari (Ed.), Education in India (pp. 100–108). Atlantic.