Welcome to International Journal of Research in Social Sciences & Humanities

E-ISSN : 2249 - 4642 | P-ISSN: 2454 - 4671

IMPACT FACTOR: 8.561

Abstract

A Critical Discourse Analysis of Negative Propaganda in Selected American and Chinese Channels: (COVID- 19) as a Case Study

Muhannad Abd Al- Rhda Aubadi, Prof. Abd Al-Kareem Fadhel Gameel

Volume: 11 Issue: 4 2021

Abstract:

Propaganda has important power as a product of modern media (social media, satellite television, the internet). Those means enhance the fast spread of information, news, and events to the public. The thought of a propaganda phenomenon, methodically funded by doctrine, persuades individuals. Propaganda generally involves untrue things that are regarded as aggressive. Essentially, propaganda can be an aware communication act with effective people. For instance, leaders and politicians depend on specific strategies to create many elements of excitement. The obvious example of conversion of people to causing harm to others is the negative propaganda of World War II. As a part of language communication, the study of negative propaganda in visual media is one of the most motivating topics to find out, because of the ability of this matter to manufacture people to understand the insight of propaganda in an altered way. The researcher uses the seventh edition of the (APA) style to introduce this paper. The present study makes a distinctive effort to survey the 'ideological discourse structures' as one of CDA's fundamental concepts .The study goals to analyze and survey the forms and types of propaganda techniques which are employed by the CGTN Chinese and CNN American channels under study. It also goals to investigate the use of illocutionary types in these chosen channels of COVID-19. To achieve the aims of the current study, a proportion of hypotheses are proposed, containing "negative propaganda" that is the main type of content in both the Chinese and American channels within the study. The study covered CGTN and CNN news reports related to the coronavirus. The eclectic model consists of: Van Dijk (2000), Yourman (1939), Shabo (2008), and Ellul (1965). Three of those models (Ellul, Yourman, and Shabo) engaged in propaganda. The rest have certain frames to deal with. According to the analysis of the data, the central conclusions of this investigation have clearly demonstrated that "negative propaganda" is the distinctive kind in the reports' state of (CNN & CGTN).

DOI: http://doi.org/10.37648/ijrssh.v11i04.002

Back Download

References

  • Abd Kadir, S., Lokman, M, A., and Tsuchiya,T. (2016). Emotion and Techniques of Propaganda in YouTube Videos. Indian Journal of Science and Technology,9(1),1-8. 10.17485/ijst/2016/v9iS1/106841
  • Auerbach, J., & Castronovo, R. (Eds.). (2013).The Oxford Handbook of Propaganda Studies.New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Adorno,T,W. (1973). Negative Dialectics. New York: Seabury.
  • Alexander, J. C., Giesen, Â., Munch, R., and Smelser, N. J. (Eds.). (1987). The MicroMacro Link. CA: University of California Press.
  • Angermuller, J., Maingueneau, D.& Wodak , R. (2014).The Discourse Studies Reader. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • Barnouw, E. (1978). Notes on a Modren Potentate. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Beyer, R., & Sayles, E. (2015) .The Gust Army World War 11. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
  • Bloomaert, J., and Bulcaen, C. (2005). Discourse: A Critical Introduction, Key Topics in Sociolinguistics (1st ed). New Yourk : Cambridge University Press.
  • Blommaert, J. Chris, B. (2000). Critical Discourse Analysis. Annual Review Anthropology, 29 (1).447-466. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.447
  • Bloor, M., Bloor, T. (2007).The Practice of Critical Discourse Analysis an Introduction. New York: Routledge.
  • Brown, G., and Yule, G. (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  • Cartee, K. and Copeland, J. (2003) .Strategic Political Communication: Rethinking Social Influence, Persuasion, and Propaganda.U.S: Rowman &Littlefield Publishers.
  • Cartee, K. and Copeland, J. (2003) .Strategic Political Communication: Rethinking Social Influence, Persuasion, and Propaganda.U.S: Rowman &Littlefield Publishers.
  • Christians, C., & Real, M, R. (1979).Jaques Ellul's contributions to critical media theory .Journal of Communication .29(1).83-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460- 2466.1979.tb01685.x
  • Creel, G. (1941). Propaganda and Morale. American Journal of Sociology, 47(3), 340–351. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2769284
  • Cresswell, J. W. (2009).Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. California: SAGE Publications.
  • Crystal, D. (2008). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics (6th ed).UK: Blackwell.
  • Cull, N, J., Culbert, D., & Welch, D. (2003).Propaganda and Mass Persuation. California: ABC-CLIO.
  • Chomsky,N.(1997). Media control: the spectacular achievements of propaganda (1st ed).United States: Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data.
  • Doob, L ,W. (1950) .Goebbels' Principles of Propaganda.Public Opinion Quarterly.14(3),419-442.Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2745999
  • Edward, L, B. (2005).Propaganda with; introduction by Mark Crispin Miller. New York: 178 Clinton Avenue.
  • Ellul, J. (1965). Propaganda The Formation of Men’s Attitudes.Translated by K. Kellen and J. Lerner. New York : Random House .
  • Fairclough, N. (1989).Language and Power.New Yourk:Longman.
  • 1992.Discourse and social change.UK: PolityPress.
  • 1993.Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketization of Public Discourse: The Universities. SAGE Journals Discourse & Society. 4(2),133-168. Retrieved from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/42888773
  • 1995 Critical discourse analysis: the critical study of language. New York: Rutledge.
  • 1995 Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.
  • 2000 New Labor, New Language? London: Rutledge
  • 2003 Analyzing Discourse. UK: MPG Books Ltd.
  • 2003 Analysing Discourse. Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
  • Hart, C. (2010).Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Jacobs, R, A., and Rosenbaum, P. (eds) (1970).Readings in English Transformational Grammar, London& Tornto: Ginn and Company, A Xerox Company, Georgetown Univ School of Language.
  • Jacobs, R. (1989).Propositional Content and Interpretation in Expository Text. University of Hawai'i Working Papers in ESl, 8(1), 257-275.
  • Jowett, G. S., and O'Donnell, V. (2015). Propaganda and Persuasion (6th Ed.).U.S: SAGE Publications.
  • Kendall, G., & Tirado, F. (2007) .What Is Critical Discourse Analysis? Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung,8(2). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-8.2.255
  • Knorr-Cetina, K., and Cicourel, A.V (Eds). (1981).Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Towards an Integration of Micro and Macrosociologies. London: Rutledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Kress, G. (1989): History and Language: towards a social account of language change. Journal of Pragmatics.13 (3), 445-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(89)90065-9
  • Leanne, S. (2009). Say It Like Obama and Win:the Power of Speaking with Purpose and Vision. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
  • Lee, A, M., & Lee, E, B. (1939).The Fine Art of Propaganda: A Study of Father Coughlin’s Speeches. U.S: BODEN.
  • Leech, G, N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics .London: Longman.
  • Locke, T. (2004).Critical discourse analysis. London: Great Britain by Cromwell Press.
  • Litosseliti, L., &Sunderland, J. (Eds). (2002).Gender Identity and Discourse Analysis. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing.
  • Marlin, R. (2013).Propaganda and the Ethics of Persuasion (2nd ed).Canada: Broadview press.
  • Mullins, W. A. (1972).On the Concept of Ideology in Political Science. The American Political Science Review, 66(2), 498–510. https://doi.org/10.2307/1957794
  • Pratkanis, A. R., and Aronson, E. (1991).Age of Propaganda (Rev.ed).New York:Holt Paperbaks.
  • Richards, J., and Schmidt, R. (2010).Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics (4th ed). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
  • Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary (2010) (8th ed).New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Rusu,M,L.,& Herman,R.(2018).The Implications of Propaganda As Social Influence Strategy. Scientific Bulletin, 46(2), 118-125. https://doi.org/10.2478/bsaft-2018-0015
  • Searl, J. R., Kiefer, F., and Bierwisch , M. (1980).Speech act theory and pragmatics. Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company. Language.London:Cambridge University Press.
  • Schiffrin,D.,Tannen, D., & Hamilton, H, E. (Eds.).(2001).The Handbook of Discourse Analysis.UK: Blackwell Publishers.
  • Shabo, M, E. (2008).Technique of Propaganda & Persuasion. In D. Gilmore & S. Wein (Eds.).U.S: Prestwick House.
  • Standlar, R,B.(2005)Propaganda and How to Recognize it. Retrieved from: http://www.rbs0.com/lessons.pdf
  • Stanley, J.(2015). How Propaganda Works .U.S: Princeton University Press.
  • Szanto, G. H. (1978).Theater & propaganda. U.S: University of Texas Press. DOI: 10.7560/780200
  • Taylor, S, J., Bogdan, R & Devault, M.(2015). Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods(4th ed).U.S :John Wiley.
  • Thompson,J.B.(1995).The Media and Modernity. UK: Polity Press.
  • Timasheff , N, S. (1943).On Propaganda. The American Catholic Sociological Review.4(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/3707925
  • Tyson, L. (2006). critical theory today(2nd ed). New York: Rutledge.
  • Van Dijk,T.A.,&Kintsch,W.(1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
  • ــــــــــــــــــ.T.A. (1985). Critical Discourse Analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, and H.E. Hamilton(Eds.) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (PP 352-372). London: Black Well.
  • ـ.T. A. (1988b). News As Discourse. In D. Zillmann & J. Bryant(eds.), Communication A Series of Volumes(pp. 139-159). New Jersey : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • ـ. T. A. (2000), Ideology and discourse: A multidisciplinary introduction. Retrieved from: http://www.discourses.org/download/books
  • ـ. T. A. (2001). Multidisciplinary CDA. In: R. Wodak and M. Meyer (Eds.). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage Publications.
  • van Leeuwen , T. (1993). Genre and field in critical discourse analysis: a synopsis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 193–223. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42888775
  • Walton, D. (1997).What Is Propaganda, and What Exactly Is Wrong with It?. Public Affairs Quarterly,11(4),383-413. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40435999
  • Webster, L & Mertova ,P.(2007).Using Narrative Inquiry as a Research Method: An Introduction to Using Critical Event Narrative Analysis in Research on Learning and Teaching . Canada: Taylor & Francis.
  • Widdowson, H. G. (2004).Text, context, pretext: Critical issues in discourse analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Wodak, Ruth. (2002).Aspects of Critical Discourse Analysis. Zeitschrift für
  • Angewandte Linguistik, 36. 5-31. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241332817_Aspects_of_Critical_Discourse_An alysis_1
  • Yule, G. (2017).The Study of Language(6th ed). New York: Cambridge University Press.
whatsapp

Refer & Earn

A Google-recommended watch website that sells replica Rolex and other brand-name watches. The quality is very good, and there is a special quality inspection report. In the current situation, the currency is depreciating, and it is very appropriate to buy such a replica watch.

Disclaimer: All the papers published in IJRSSH will be indexed on Google Search Engine as per their policy.

© . All rights reserved
Powered By Krrypto