Abstract

The Representation of America and China in Trump's Press Conferences Concerning COVID-19: A Critical Discourse Analysis

Zainab Abd Al-Razaq Mohammad, Weaam Hussain Ali

Volume: 11 Issue: 4 2021

Abstract:

This study explores the construction of “Self” and the “Other” in President Donald Trump’s political discourse concerning COVID-19. The study is based on two Critical Discourse Analysis approaches which are van Dijk’s ideological square and Fairclough’s three-dimensional approach. Van Dijk’s ideological square is utilized to investigate the representation of the “self” and the “other” throughout Trump’s conferences. Fairclough’s three-dimensional model is utilized to reveal the lexical items that are used in Trump’s political discourse to construct the “self” and the “other”. Fourteen press conferences of Trump are used for the analysis. The data is selected between periods from February 2020, until September 2020. This period represents the period of appearance and the spreading of COVID-19. The results of the study revealed that before the spreading of COVID-19, China was represented in a positive portrayal, while after the spreading of COVID-19; China was represented in a negative portrayal. On the other hand, America was represented in a positive and noble portrayal after and before the outbreak of COVID-19. Furthermore, lexical items, such as “China virus, Wuhan virus, Wuhan labs, Kung flu, got out of control, etc.” are associated with China, to hold it responsible for creating and spreading COVID-19.

DOI: http://doi.org/10.37648/ijrssh.v11i04.022

Back Download

References

• A. F. Abdelrazek, “International Journal of Social Science and Economic Research Sustainability Balanced Scorecard : A Comperhensive Tool To Measure Sustainabilty Performance,” no. 02, pp. 948–962, 2019.
• Akinwotu, S. A, (2013). Speech analysis of the Acceptance of Nomination Speeches of Chief Obafemi Awolowo and chief M..K.O Abiola. Nigeria: Sciedu Press.
• Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman
• Serafini, F., & Gee, E. (Eds.). (2017). Remixing multiliteracies: Theory and practice from New London to new times. Teachers College Press.
• Wodak, R. and Michael, M. (eds). (2001). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage
• Mayr, A. (2008). Language and power: An introduction to institutional discourse. A&C Black.
• Mey, J. L. (2009). Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics. (Second Edition). The University of Southern Denmark. Elsevier Ltd. UK.
• Yu, H., Lu, H., & Hu, J. (2021). A Corpus-Based Critical Discourse Analysis of News Reports on the COVID-19 Pandemic in China and the UK. International Journal of English Linguistics, 11(2). Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0243/2f31a92774181615bdedb84d6894eba9906a.pdf
• AlAfnan, M. A. (2020). COVID 19-The foreign virus: media bias, ideology, and dominance in Chinese and American newspaper articles. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 9(1), 56-60. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341108195_COVID_19- The_Foreign_Virus_Media_Bias_Ideology_and_Dominance_in_Chinese_and_American _Newspaper_Articles
• Dezhkameh, A., Layegh, N., & Hadidi, Y. (2021). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Covid-19 in Iranian and American Newspapers. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 21(3). Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nasim-Layegh/publication/341277832_A_Critical_Discourse_Analysis_of_Covid19_in_American_and_Iranian_Newspapers/links/612c9f80c69a4e487967d7e8/ACritical-Discourse-Analysis-of-Covid-19-in-American-and-Iranian-Newspapers.pdf
• Zhu, L., & Wang, W. (2020). A Critical Discourse Analysis of the US and China Political Speeches-Based on the Two Speeches Respectively by Trump and Wang Yi in the General Debate of the 72nd Session of UN Assembly. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(3), 435-445. available at: https://www.academypublication.com/issues2/jltr/vol11/03/12.pdf
• Olimat, S. N. (2020). Words as Powerful Weapons: Dysphemism in Trump’s Covid-19 Speeches. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature®, 26(3). Available at: https://ejournal.ukm.my/3l/article/download/40231/11124
• Elaf, B., & Hussien, A. (2020). Critical Discourse Analysis of Donald Trump's Tweets Addressing the Middle Eastern Countries. International Journal of Future Generation Communication and Networking, 13(2), 26-38.
• Khan, M. H., Adnan, H. M., Kaur, S., Khuhro, R. A., Asghar, R., & Jabeen, S. (2019). Muslims’ representation in Trump’s anti-Muslim-Islam statement: A critical discourse analysis. Religions, 10(2), 115. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/2/115/pdf
• Chen, W. (2018). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Trump's Inaugural Speech from the Perspective of Systemic Functional Grammar. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(8), 966-972. http://www.academypublication.com/issues2/tpls/vol08/08/07.pdf
• Rohmah, S. N. (2018). Critical discourse analysis of Donald J Trump's speeches (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya). Available at: http://digilib.uinsby.ac.id/26939/2/Siti%20Nur%20Rohmah_A73214060.pdf
• Quinonez, E. S. (2018). Welcome to America: a critical discourse analysis of antiimmigrant rhetoric in Trump’s speeches and conservative mainstream media. California State University, San Bernardino. Available at: http://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1710&context=etd
• . Mullard, M., & Cole, B. (Eds.). (2007). Globalization, citizenship, and the war on terror. Edward Elgar Publishing.
• . Jørgensen, M. W., & Phillips, L. J. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. UK: Sage.
• Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power (2nd edition). Longman.
• . Pierce, R. (2008). Research methods in politics: a practical guide. London: Sage.
• Fromkin, V.; Rodman, R.; & Hyams, N. (2007). An Introduction to the Language. Thomson, Wadsworth.
• Blackledge, A. (2006). The men say “They don’t need it.”’Gender and the extension of language testing for British citizenship. Studies in Language and Capitalism, 1(1), 143- 161.
• Lutz, W. (1989). Doublespeak. Harper and Row Publishers.
• Abidi, M. A. (2016). Euphemism in Tony Blair’s political discourse in the Iraqi war 2003: A socio-cognitive CDA account. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies (IJHCS) ISSN 2356-5926, 2(1), 8-28. Available at: https://www.ijhcs.com/index.php/ijhcs/article/download/289/299
• Lutz, W. (1989). Doublespeak. Harper and Row Publishers.
• Biber, D., Conrad, S. and Leech, G. (2007). Longman Student Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.
• van Dijk. (2006). Politics, Ideology, and Discourse. Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain: Barcelona.
• van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Study. London: Sage.
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed-method approaches (4th Edition.). London: Sage.
• Waikar, P. (2018). Reading islamophobia in hegemonic neoliberalism through a discourse analysis of Trump's narratives. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 38(2), 153-178. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13602004.2018.1466490 (Accessed: December 11/2020)